In the
story of Noah and the Flood, God looked down upon the earth and discovered that
humanity had become evil and corrupt. As punishment for their corruption, God
decided to wipe them out with a flood. However, God chose to spare Noah and his
family and commanded Noah to build an immense ark. This ark would hold not only
Noah and his kin, but also a male and female of every animal on earth. The
flood was supposed to last for 40 days and 40 nights, though it wasn’t until
far after that that the earth was no longer flooded with water. Eventually,
Noah and his family and all the animals were able to come out of the ark and return
to the earth. God told them to repopulate and replenish the earth and made a
covenant with Noah and his sons.
Out of all
the animals that are on earth, and that would’ve been on the ark I suppose, the
one that intrigues me the most is the elephant. I’ve always adored elephants because
while they are these massive, beautiful, and majestic animals, they are also incredibly
expressive of emotions. While they can be playful, what is most interesting is
that elephants express what could possibly be grief. When an elephant dies,
sometimes other elephants will throw themselves to the ground and refuse to
leave. Also it has been seen that some elephants will return to the place of
death and look over the dead elephant. While it has not been completely proven
that elephants grieve, it is certainly fascinating to think about and moving to
watch.
While
in Noah and the Ark the world seemed to nearly end by being drowned in water,
between fire and ice I’m not entirely sure which would ultimately cause the
world’s demise. Though I side with Robert Frost in that if I had to choose I
would say that the world would end with fire, however it could easily end in
ice as well. I’ve always felt that in
his poem “Fire and Ice,” Robert Frost says it best (though the fire and ice he
refers to are ultimately symbols for something else):
Fire and Ice
BY Robert Frost
Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
It seems a little more likely that
the world would end with flames if you take the sun into account and humanity’s
fascination with things with, shall we say, fiery and explosive qualities.
However, I feel it wouldn’t be right to dismiss ice as a possibility because it
could be equally destructive and who knows, as improbable as it may seem, it
may be what the world ends in.
No comments:
Post a Comment